<regestum>
Georg Vogeler
G.Vogeler at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Fr Nov 12 16:18:10 CET 2004
Hello from Munich,
> 6.) I'm somewhat unhappy with <regestum>. As far as I have understood
> this would contain ALL the information on a given charter except the
> text? Then we would have an extremely wide notion of "regestum" since
> this would include all bibliographic reference, description of
> physical phenomena, discussion of authenticity, discussion of the
> content of a charter and so on. Is this really the common use of the
> word "regestum"? I have some doubts. Maybe we can find a more generic
> word? And the restrict <regestum> to what it really means: the short
> summary of the main information of a given charter. And for this, the
> word has a perfectly clear and specific notion and should be an
> element rather than an attribute of another already established
> element.
We have two elements in our list which could easily be confused in
German as both are called "Regest": One is the "Kopfregest" heading
an scholarly edition and the other is the "Vollregest" like that they
are collecting for the Regesta imperii, giving the content of the
document, extensive description and some historical and diplomatic
analysis.
If we see the "Kopfregest" together with the following parts (textual
tradition, bibliographic informationes, diplomatic analysis) and
compare that kind of text with the "Vollregest" of the Regesta
imperii then I find them very similar. Thus we could do it with the
term "<regestum>" for the "Vollregest" (including information on
textual tradition etc.) and "<abstract>" for the "Kopfregest" (or
"summary" or "analyse" in french).
And finally I think the archival description is similar to the
"Vollregest" and also called "Regest". But Karsten Uhde can correct
me.
Thus I would stick to
<regestum>
<abstract> ...</abstract>
<witList> ... </witlist>
...
</regestum>
<tenor>
...
</tenor>
Best wishes
Georg
_________________________________________________________
Historisches Seminar
Abteilung Geschichtliche Hilfswissenschaften
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Muenchen
Postadresse: Geschwister-Scholl-Platz 1, D-80539 Muenchen
Bueroadresse: Amalienstr. 52, Zi. 211
T: ++49-89-2180 3784 F: ++49-89-21 80 2084
e-mail: G.Vogeler at lmu.de
http://www.geschichte.uni-muenchen.de/ghw/personen_vogeler.shtml
Moderator von der Virtual Library Geschichtliche Hilfswissenchaften
(http://www.vl-ghw.lmu.de)
Mehr Informationen über die Mailingliste cei-l