<regestum>

Sa Nov 13 14:19:55 CET 2004

Patrick Sahle a écrit :

>If everybody sees <regestum> as a common and easily understandable term for
>what we are talking about (all the header-information of an edited
>charter), then there is no more resistance to this point from my side.
>  
>
I'm like you, Patrick, i don't like this <regestum> element in <body> 
element to indicate all the header-information of an edited charter. I 
understand Georg's argument for the Regesta imperii project. But, for 
me, our goal is to define a structure of a charter and not just a 
regestum... For me, if you edite a charter and regestum, it's different 
: it's two different type of document, so two different structure in XML.
Morevoer, i understand the difference between Vollregest and Kopfregest, 
but if we read the CID definition, a regestum is a little sentence to 
resume and analyze the charter and not all header-information of an 
edited charter. It's just a part of this information.
If i understand good, the <regestum> element together all the 
header-information and <tenor> the edited text. But, if we read the TEI 
guideliness, the <regestum> correspond <front> element  and <tenor> 
correspond <body> element.  But, like Patrick,  if everybody is ok with 
<regestum> element, i didn't say nothing.

Gautier