Talk by Erik Curiel at MCMP (18th Dec)
Dardashti, Radin
Radin.Dardashti at lrz.uni-muenchen.de
Fri Dec 13 18:06:54 CET 2013
Speaker: Erik Curiel (MCMP/LMU)
Wednesday 18th Dec 2013
Location: Ludwigstr. 31 room 021
Time: 16:15 - 17:45
Title: Are Classical Black Holes Hot or Cold?
Abstract:
In the early 1970s it was realized that there is a striking formal
analogy between the so-called laws of black-hole mechanics and the laws
of classical thermodynamics. Before the discovery of Hawking radiation,
however, it was generally thought that the analogy was only formal, and
did not reflect a deep connection between gravitational and
thermodynamical phenomena. In particular, it is still commonly held that
the surface gravity of a stationary black hole can be construed as a
true physical temperature only when quantum effects are taken into
account; in the context of classical general relativity alone, one
cannot cogently construe it so. Does the use of quantum field theory in
curved spacetime offer the only hope for taking the analogy seriously?
I think the answer is 'no'. To attempt to justify that answer, I shall
begin by arguing that the standard argument to the contrary is not
physically well founded, and in any event begs the question. Looking at
the various ways that the idea of "temperature" enters classical
thermodynamics then will suggest arguments that, I claim, show the
analogy between classical black-hole mechanics and classical
thermodynamics should be taken more seriously, at least so far as
temperature goes, without the need to rely on or invoke quantum
mechanics. If this is correct, then there may be a deep connection
between classical general relativity and classical thermodynamics on
their own, independent of quantum mechanics.
More information about the philphysmunich
mailing list