Dear Georg: I would agree with following my suggestion ;-) and also with breaking it down as you suggest (do we also need a date for the status of transmission, even approximate?). I also do not like the name of the facet, but I cannot think of anything better at the moment...it must be the heat... Luciana At 08:14 AM 28/07/2007, you wrote:
Dear colleagues,
as there weren't any new suggestions to the diplomatic discourse section I would like to open the discussion for the next facet, we called in spring not very convincing "Philology" adressing principally the questions of critical edition. The most part of our elements in http://www.cei.lmu.de/facetedview.php?facetID=65 are borrowed from the TEI. If I'm right only <traditioForm> is not really covered by the TEI. I would suggest to follow Lucianas proposal to change the name to "transmission" and would propose myself to add as childs transmissionStatus (i.e. original, copy, authenticated copy etc.), transmissionResp for the person - if known - who is responsible for the copy etc. and transmissionDate as we already introduced in the chronology facet.
I'm curious to read your comments and receive other proposals for this section until end of September
All the best
Georg
-- ------------------------------------- Dr.Georg Vogeler
Università del Salento Dipartimento dei Beni delle Arti e della Storia Monastero degli Olivetani Viale San Nicola I - 73100 Lecce
+39 346 7270613
g.vogeler@lrz.uni-muenchen.de http://www.geschichte.uni-muenchen.de/ghw/personen_vogeler.shtml
Dr. Luciana Duranti Professor, Archival Studies Director, The InterPARES Project www.interpares.org School of Library, Archival and Information Studies www.slais.ubc.ca The University of British Columbia Suite 301, 6190 Agronomy Road Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3 CANADA Tel: 604.822.2587 FA: 604.822.6006 www.interpares.org/ld/